Srinibasa Sahoo v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C ) No. 19359 of 2022 Srinibasa Sahoo ....

Petitioner -versusUnion of India & Others ....

Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

25.08.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "The opp. parties shall not be directed to regularize the service of the petitioner as Faculty, Rural Statistics under SIRD & PR, Odisha, Bhubaneswar in terms of the guidelines fixed by the Govt. of India.

The opp. parties shall not be directed to pay the arrear and present salary at par with UGC Scale of pay since May, 2018 till date."

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting her grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

// 2 // 5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sangita