Umamani Panda v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 355 of 2008 Umamani Panda ....

Petitioner Ms. S. Sahoo, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

06.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to consider her case for appointment in the post of primary school teacher with all service and financial benefits. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.4 vide Annexure-18, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.4 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-18, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Ashok