Kukuma Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9674 of 2022 Kukuma Sahoo & another ....

Petitioner Mr. Partha Sarathi Nayak, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr.Shashanka Patra, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA

ORDER

07.09.2022 Order No.

01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 452/342/147/148/323/307/506/379/149, I.P.C. 4.

Considering the seriousness of the allegation, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, although I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners, however it is observed that, in the event the Petitioners surrender and move for bail before the learned S.D.J.M., Angul in G.R. Case No.972 of 2022 corresponding to Bantala P.S. Case No.248 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

// 2 // While imposing conditions for bail, learned Magistrate shall also impose the following additional conditions - (i) The Petitioners shall not threaten, terrorise, ill-treat or harass the Informant and his family members in any manner whatsoever, while on bail by virtue of this order;

(ii) They shall appear before the I.O. and shall cooperate with the investigation as and when required.

(iii) They shall also appear before the learned trial court on each date of trial, without fail.

Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail of the Petitioners.

5.

The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.

6.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. (A.K. Mohapatra) Judge S.K.Parida