Sunita Dash v. Bapi Rana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No.640 of 2019 Sunita Dash and Others ....

Appellants Mr. K.C. Nayak, Advocate -versusBapi Rana and Another ....

Respondents Mr. P.K. Mahali, counsel for Respondent No.2

CORAM:

SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

10.11.2022 Order No.

I.A. No.290 of 2022 & MACA No.640 of 2019 06.

1.

The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. K.C. Nayak, learned counsel for the Appellants and Mr. P.K. Mahali, learned counsel for insurer - Respondent No.2. 3.

There is delay of 2 years 155 days in filing the appeal. 4.

Perusal of the limitation petition does not reveal any sufficient reason to condone such long delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the limitation petition is dismissed. Consequently the appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation.

( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda