Pratima Devi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 13961 of 2016 Pratima Devi .....

Petitioner Mr. A.K. Mohanty, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA (O.Ps.1 & 2) Mr. B.B. Mohanty, Advocate (O.P.5)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S. K. MISHRA

ORDER

05.08.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. A.K. Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. B.B. Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.5.

3.

Mr. B.B. Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.5 contended that pursuant to Order dated 19.05.2016 passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.2977(C) of 2012, the benefit has been extended to Opposite Party No.5 by giving him appointment. It is also contended that in the meantime, Opposite Party No.5 got promotion and also retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation.

4.

In view of the above, nothing remains more to be decided in this Writ Petition. However, if any cause of action survives, it is

open to the Petitioner to take necessary steps in accordance with law.

5.

With the above observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok/Ananta (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE