Pankajini Pahi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 1014 of 2008 Pankajini Pahi ....

Petitioner Mr. P.N.Mohanty, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha and Ors.

....

Opp. Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to add five years of service to the qualifying service of the petitioner in accordance with Rule-32 of the Orissa Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1992 for enabling her to avail full pension and gratuity. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-2 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide

Annexure-2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Arun