Sagarika Das v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23763 Of 2020 (Through video conferencing mode) Sagarika Das ...

Petitioner Mr. H.K.Mahanta, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ...

Opposite parties Mr. Y.S.P.Babu, AGA Mr. A. Dash, Advocate for opposite party no.4 CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

11.01.2022 05.

1. Mr. Mahanta, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client wants return of sale deed, presented for registration but not registered because his client's - vendor was not present.

2.

Mr. Babu, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State.

3.

Mr. Das, learned advocate appears on behalf of opposite party no.4 and submits, his client has been alleged to be the vendor. 4.

On query from Court Mr. Mahanata could not point out statement made in the petition that his client had presented the document. At this stage he wants to not press the writ petition.

// 2 // 5.

Petitioner's submissions have been considered and are found to be without merit.

6.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant