Prafulla Kumar Satpathy v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 2200 of 2008 Prafulla Kumar Satpathy .....

Petitioner Mr.N.C. Sahoo, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

10.01.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that due to pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner is not able to get the retiral benefits, therefore, the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority for release of the retiral dues.

3.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. 4.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)