Sanjay Kumar Pati v. Collector, Sundargarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 17733 of 2019 Sanjay Kumar Pati .....

Petitioner Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate Vs.

Collector, Sundargarh and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Nayak, ASC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

09.11.2022 Order No.

3.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to include the name of the petitioner as displaced family under R.R. Policy 2006.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.1 highlighting the grievances as has been made in this writ petition and direction may be given to the said authority to consider the same within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive

representation before opposite party no.1 within fifteen days hence, the said authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with the certified copy of this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE