Rajendra Dani v. Collector, Sundargarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 17737 of 2019 Rajendra Dani .....

Petitioner Mr.A.Tripathy, Advocate.

Vs.

Collector, Sundargarh & Others .....

Opposite Parties Mr.H.M.Dhal, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.11.2022 Order No.

04.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. A.Tripathy, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.H.M.Dhal, learned Additional Government Advocate for the StateOpposite Parties. 3.

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Why the Opp.Party No.1 and 2 will not be directed to include the name of the petitioner as displaced family under R.R.Policy 2006 and (ii) Why the Opp.Party No.3 will not be directed to give compensation / benefits i.e. employment or monetary benefits to the petition under R.R.Policy 2006 within a stipulated time".

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

5.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

Subrat (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (B. P. SATAPATHY) JUDGE