← Library
Orissa High CourtWP(C)/20392/2022disposed off

Kishore Chandra Swain v. State Of Odisha

2022-09-02Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.20392 of 2022 Kishore Chandra Swain ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

02.09.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard Ms. D.Mahapatra, learned counsel for Petitioner and Mr. Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties.

3.

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- " Under the facts and circumstances as narrated above, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule NISI to the opposite parties and if the opposite parties fail to show cause or shown insufficient case, make the said Rule absolute by directing the Opposite Parties, more specifically opposite party no.3 to finalize the advances given to the petitioner in an early date so as to enable the petitioner to get his retiral benefits;

And further be pleased to pass any other order / orders as may be deemed fit and proper'

And for this act of kindness, the humble petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray". 4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed representation at Annexure-8-Series to the Writ Petition,

// 2 // before the opposite party No.3 but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat