Amar Srichandan v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9927 of 2022 Amar Srichandan & others ....

Petitioners Mr.Sanjib Ku. Bhanjadeo,Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr.M.K.Mohanty, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

22.08.2022 02.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 3.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Petitioners in the present case are in-laws. He further submits that the husband of the informant has already been enlarged on bail by this Court.

5.

Considering the age of the Petitioner, the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the fact of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners. However, it is directed that in the event the Petitioners surrender before the learned

// 2 // S.D.J.M., Khurda in G.R.Case No.1244 of 2022 arising out of Jankia P.S.Case No. 277 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today and move for bail, they shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with further conditions that while on bail the Petitioners shall not threaten, influence, terrorise or harass the informant and her family members and shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the I.O. as and when required and also appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed. Violation of conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

7.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge RKS