Ayojina Nayak v. Utkal University, Bbsr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 20780 of 2022 Ayojina Nayak .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Rath, Advocate Vs.

Utkal University, Bhubaneswar and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Mohanty, A.G.A.

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI Mr. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER

05.09.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.2 to allow the petitioner to appear her Back Papers of 3rd, 4th, 7th and 8th Semesters of Integrated Master in Computer Application : 2014-2019 batch, as there was loss of two Academic Years due to COVID-19 and further to issue direction to the said opposite party to consider her representation under Annexure-2.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-2 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time.

5.

Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing to opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-2 and pass appropriate

order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order. 6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (G. SATAPATHY) Alok/Subhasmita JUDGE