Narmada Kumari Dalei v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 20971 of 2022 Narmada Kumari Dalai .....

Petitioner Mr. A. Rout, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties Standing Counsel S&ME

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

09.11.2022 Order No.

02.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.3 to submit the proposal before the Controller of Accounts for opening of GPF Account within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.3 highlighting the grievances and direction may be given to consider the same within a stipulated time taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Ritanjali Giri @ Paul v. State of Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & others, 2016 (I) ILR-1162, to which learned Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education Department has no objection.

4.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, however, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of with the direction that in case the petitioner, with regard to the grievance made in this petition, files a fresh comprehensive representation before the opposite

party no.3, within fifteen days hence, the said authority shall consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order, taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation along with certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J)