Tuku @ Pratima Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.10186 of 2022 Tuku @ Pratima Nayak ....

Petitioner Mr. Samarendra Bahadur,Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr.S.Patra,A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

26.08.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 3.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that Petitioner is a lady and the principal allegation is against her husband.

5.

Considering the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. However, it is directed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned J.M.F.C., Chandbali in G.R.Case No.588 of 2022 arising out of Bansada

// 2 // P.S.Case No.265 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today and moves for bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with the further conditions that the Petitioner while on bail shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the I.O. as and when required and shall appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed. The Petitioner shall not threaten, influence, terrorise or harass the informant and her family members in any manner whatsoever. Violation of conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

6.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge RKS