Gopichand H.Krishnani v. Ashish Kumar Jain

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.21569 of 2022 Gopichand H. Krishnani ....

Petitioner Mr. V. Sharma, Proxy Counsel on behalf of M/s. B. Baivab and associates, Advocates -versusAshish Kumar Jain and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Parhi, DSGI for Opposite Parties 5 to 8

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

ORDER

12.12.2022 Order No.

03.

1. This case was adjourned three months ago at the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, who wanted to place case laws to show how the writ petition is maintainable.

2. Today, again an adjournment is sought. The Court does not find the request to be reasonable. When asked to proceed with the matter, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner expresses his inability to do so.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge M. Panda