Narayan Majhi v. Nityananda Biswal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.21778 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) Narayan Majhi ....

Petitioner Mr. A. Panda, Advocate -versusNityananda Biswal and others ....

Opposite Parties CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

ORDER

05.09.2022 Order No.

01.

1.

Mr. Panda, learned advocate, appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had obtained loan. Repayment fall arrears. His client made representation under annexure-2, for regularization of the account. The bank be directed to consider and dispose of the representation. 2.

On query from Court Mr. Panda submits, opposite party no.1 is guarantor.

3.

In view of aforesaid, Court is not inclined to direct issuance of notice. Instead, opposite party nos.2 and 3, either jointly or severely, are directed to consider and dispose of petitioner's representation dated 15th August, 2022 and inform him the result, within two weeks of communication. 4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant