Satish Kumar Sahoo v. Permanent Lok Adalat (P.U.S)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.19789 of 2018 (Through hybrid mode) Satish Kumar Sahoo ....

Petitioner Ms. S. Mohanty, Advocate -versusPermanent Lok Adalat (P.U.S) and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A. K. Sharma, AGA Mr. S. K. Sarangi, Senior Advocate for O.P.2 Mr. N. C. Nishra, Advocate for Bank CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

ORDER

09.09.2022 09.

1.

Ms. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner Order No.

and files memo of date on submission, her client does not want to proceed with the case.

2.

Mr. Sarangi, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of the insurance company and draws attention to order dated 7th September, 2022, bearing record of he having handed over order dated 20th January, 2018 to show that contrary to petitioner's contention, settlement was attempted by the Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA). Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of bank while Mr. Sharma,

// 2 // learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State.

3.

On record of submissions as above, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant