Sk. Tuku @ Gora @ Sk. Tahit v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.11449 of 2022 Sk.Tuku @ Gora @ Sk.Tahit & another ....

Petitioners Mr. Ranjan Ku. Nayak,Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr.P.C.Das,A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

16.09.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 3.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown accused persons. They apprehend arrest as they have been named by one of the witnesses. Further it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Petitioners do not have similar nature of criminal antecedents. 5.

Considering the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, I am not inclined to grant

// 2 // anticipatory bail to the Petitioners. However, it is directed that in the event the Petitioners surrender before the learned S.D.J.M., Baripada in C.T.Case No.1595 of 2022 arising out of Baripada Sadar P.S.Case No.137 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today and move for bail, they shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with further conditions that the Petitioners while on bail shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the I.O. as and when required and appear before the trial court on each and every date fixed.

6.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge RKS