Umakanta Nayak v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 9091 of 2022 Umakanta Nayak ....

Petitioner Mr. B. Rout, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

02.11.2022 Order No.

02.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

The petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. Case No.332 of 2022, pending in the file of the learned S.D.J.M., Nilgiri, arising out of Berhampur P.S. Case No.74 of 2022, for alleged commission of offences under Sections 420/406/120-B/294/506 of IPC.

4.

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Nilgiri, by order dated 14.09.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

5.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the co-accused one Basanta Behera @ Kamala was released on bail

by this Court by order dated 14.10.2022 in BLAPL No.9181 of 2022.

6.

It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there having been no seizure from the petitioner, he has lesser complicity. Hence on the ground of parity the petitioner seeks bail.

7.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 8.

There is nothing on record to indicate if any money has been siphoned off to the accounts of the present petitioner. 9.

Taking into account the nature of allegations and substantial progress in investigation relating to the complicity of the petitioner and considering the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the first offender, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the Court in seisin over the matter.

10.

While enlarging the petitioner on bail, the learned Court below shall examine as to whether the petitioner is the first offender. If it comes to the fore that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, this order shall stand recalled.

11.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

12.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Ayesha