Rangadhar Pati v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 24328 of 2022 Rangadhar Pati and another .....

Petitioner Mr. P. Dash, Advocate Vs.

State of Orissa and another .....

Opposite Parties Mr. J. Patnaik, GA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

21.09.2022 Order No.

02.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the notice of eviction issued by the Tahasildar, Bhandaripokhari dated 14.09.2022 under Annexure-4 series.

4.

Mr. J. Patnaik, learned Government Advocate contended that instead of filing objection to the notice issued to the petitioner, the petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ petition, which is not maintainable.

5.

Since the Petitioner has come up challenging the notice of eviction, this writ petition is a premature one. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue his remedy before the appropriate authority by filing objection, if he is so advised, so that the matter can be considered and appropriate orders can be passed in accordance with law. 6.

With that liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)