Umesh Thanapati v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.996 OF 2010 Umesh Thanapati .....

Petitioner Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to dispose his representation under Annexure-8 within a stipulated period and he further seeks direction to opposite party no.2 to release/pay his salary as per the revised scale of pay, i.e. Rs.4, 000-100-6,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.11.1998 as the other adhoc employees in the similar posts are getting and to which the petitioner is also entitled as per the Government guidelines under Annexure-7 and also regularize his service from the date of his joining.

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-8 and the same may be directed to be

considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5. As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-8 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE