Amit Kumar Dikshit v. Project Director,Nhai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.29833 of 2021 Amit Kumar Diskhit ....

Petitioner Mr. K.A. Guru, Advocate -versusThe Project Director, N.H.A.I & another ....

Opp. Parties Mr. A. Das, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

20.01.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard Mr. K.A. Guru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Das, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 3.

At the outset, on oral prayer, Mr. Guru is permitted to implead the Collector, Keonjhar as opposite party No.3 to this writ petition.

Office is directed to make consequential corrections in the cause title.

4.

During course of hearing, Mr. Guru wants to withdraw this writ application as he wants to approach the Collector, Keonjhar (opposite party No.3) for redressal of the grievances of the petitioner in tune with the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956.

5.

Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may

// 2 // utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

(Biswajit Mohanty) Judge Prasant ( K.R. Mohapatra) Judge