Sisir Kumar Choudhury v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 313 of 2010 Sisir Kumar Choudhury ....

Petitioner Mr. S.N. Patnaik, Adv.

-Versus - State of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

02.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite party no.2 to disburse the arrear D.A. along with other financial benefits within a stipulated time. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the representation under Annexure-4 of the petitioner has already been recommended by opposite party no.3 to opposite party no.2 under Annexure-7 and, therefore, direction may be given to take a decision on the same within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to take a decision on the recommendation made by the opposite party no.3 under Annexure-7, and pass appropriate in

accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court's website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court's notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court's Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge Ashok