Shailabala Sahoo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 25454 of 2022 Shailabala Sahoo .....

Petitioner Mr. N. Panda, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

28.09.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. N. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.

The Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties not to evict her from her land. 4.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in possession of her own land, but after demarcation the opposite parties are trying to evict her from her land. 5.

In view of the above prayer made by the petitioner, it is open to him to approach the appropriate common law forum by ventilating her grievance.

6.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)