← Library
Orissa High CourtBLAPL/9511/2022allowed

Prakash Kumar Nayak v. State Of Odisha

2022-11-22Mr. Justice V. Narasingh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 9511 of 2022 Prakash Kumar Nayak ....

Petitioner Mr. S.N. Mishra (4), Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

22.11.2022 Order No.

02.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

The petitioner is an accused in Special (POCSO) Case No.65 of 2022, pending in the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court under POCSO Act, Bhadrak, arising out of Naikandihi P.S. Case No.171 of 2022, for commission of alleged offences under Sections 363/366/376(2)(n)/294/341/506/34 of IPC read with Section 6 of POCSO Act.

4.

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned A.D.J.-cum-Spl. Court under POCSO Act, Bhadrak by order dated 20.09.2022 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed. 5.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2022 and as charge sheet has already been filed on 14.10.2022, further continuance of the petitioner in custody is not warranted.

6.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 7.

Perused the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim. 8.

Considering the tenor thereof and taking into account filing of charge sheet and period of custody, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

9.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

10.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rule. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi