Anupama Mishra v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.382 OF 2018 Anupama Mishra .....

Petitioner Ms. B.K. Pattnaik, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

12.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the orders dated 30.07.2012 and 16.01.2017 under Annexures No.6 and 8 respectively and further to issue direction to the opposite parties to promote the petitioner to the post of Lady Supervisor and to regularize her leave period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-9 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-9 and pass appropriate order in accordance

with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE