Hari Suna v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 214 of 2018 Hari Suna .....

Petitioner Mr. S. Behera, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

09.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to regularize his service within a stipulated time.

3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already made representation before opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-6, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar Nayak v. Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. & others, 2017 (II) ILR CUT-912 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands disposed of directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-6 taking into consideration the judgment of this

Court in the case of Rajendra Kumar Nayak v. Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. & others, 2017 (II) ILR CUT-912, by passing a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE