Meena Naik v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26142 of 2022 Meena Naik ....
Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....
Opposite Parties COROM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
13.10.2022
1. 1.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
Order No 2.
On the oral prayer made by Mr. S.K.Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner, he is permitted to correct some typographical error in prayer No.(ii) in Court today.
3.
Heard. Mr. S.K.Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.A.P.Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.
4.
The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dtd.27.09.2022 issued by the Opposite Party No.3 under Annexure-6.
4.
It is submitted that without considering the relevancy and effect of the orders passed by the learned Tribunal on 16.11.2018 in O.A No.701 of 2018 and order dtd.20.01.2014 passed in O.A No.1311 of 2013, the claim of the Petitioner for her promotion as against UR vacancy was not considered in its proper prospective while issuing the impugned notice on 27.09.2022. It is accordingly submitted that the matter be remitted to the O.P. No.3 to take a fresh decision by following the order passed by the learned Tribunal in the above noted two cases.
// 2 // 5.
Mr. Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State has no serious objection with regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner for remitting the matter and taking a fresh decision on the Petitioner's claim in the light of the order passed by the learned Tribunal.
6.
Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the Parties, this Court while disposing the writ petition directs the O.P. No.3 to take fresh decision on the claim of the Petitioner for her promotion as against UR vacancy in the light of the order passed by the learned Tribunal in the above noted cases as well as an order passed by this Court on 23.09.2022 in W.P.(C) (OA) No.553 of 2018.
7.
Petitioner is directed to provide copies of the order passed by the learned Tribunal as well as by this Court in W.P.(C) (OA) No.553 of 2018 along with the certified copy of this order before the O.P. No.3 within a period of seven (7) days from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of the same, O.P. No.3 shall take a fresh decision on the claim of the Petitioner for his promotion as against UR vacancies within a further period of two
(2) months from the date of receipt of the order. The order so passed be also communicated to the Petitioner within the extended time period.
8.
The Writ Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat