Sabita Kanungo v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.263 OF 2018 Sabita Kanungo .....

Petitioner Mr. K.K. Swain, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

14.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the letters dated 17.05.2017 and 06.07.2017 issued by the Principal, Industrial Training Institute, Hirakud under Annexures-6 & 7 and further to issue direction to the opposite parties to release the balance gratuity amount in favour of the petitioner without insisting for deduction of the alleged amount of Rs.1,98,458/- pursuant to aforesaid letters within a stipulated period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.3 vide Annexure10 series and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time taking into consideration the ratio decided by this Court in Pritilata Mohapatra v. State of Odisha, to which learned State Counsel has no objection. 5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-10 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration the ratio decided by this Court in Pritilata Mohapatra (supra) within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE