Kartik Chandra Swain v. D.G. Of Police, Crpf, New Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26340 of 2022 Kartik Chandra Swain ....
Petitioner -versusD.G. of Police, CRPF, New Delhi & Ors.
....
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
11.10.2022 01.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard Mr. R.C. Swain, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. B.K. Padhi, learned CGC along with Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned ASGI appearing for the Opp. Parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "Under this circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a rule Nisi calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus shall not be issued directing the Opp. Parties to recalculation/re-fixation of the pay/salary of the petitioner at Rs.68,000/- instead of Rs.52,000/-, like the others and pay all the financial benefits such as monthly enhanced salary and its arrears by taking in to account of the ACP and MACP Scheme and annexure-6 as early as possible for the ends of justice. If the opposite parties failed to show cause or show insufficient cause, the rule may be made absolute.
AND Further be pleased to pass any other order/orders as deemed fit and proper
// 2 // AND For this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray."
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has filed an application at Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha