Chitta Ranjan Jena v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OAC) No.1887 of 2018 Chitta Ranjan Jena ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

19.09.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3.

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) Under these circumstances, it is humbly prayed therefore that the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to regularize the service of the applicant as Attendant from the date she completed 6 years of service in view of the G.A Department Resolution dated 17.09.2013;

And further be pleased to direct the respondents to give all consequential service and financial benefits to the applicant;

Or pass such other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

And allow this Original Application with cost".

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, before

// 2 // the opposite party No.2 but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law and also taking into account the order passed under Annexure-4 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat