Ramakrishna Nag v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.842 OF 2018 Ramkrishna Nag .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Behera, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

13.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties to appoint him in Class-III post of Jr. Clerk/Amin on the basis of approval order of the Govt. and Director at Annexures-3 & 4 and further to modify the appointment order at Annexure-5 as has been done in case of Pramod Kumar Pradhan as per letter dated 23.10.2013 at Annexure-8/ 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-9 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.

5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner

vide Annexure-9 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE