Pramodini Paikray v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.2090 of 2022 Pramodini Paikray ....

Petitioner Mr.Niranjan Panda, Adv.

-versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties Mr.C.S.Mishra,AGA

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.

ORDER

19.12.2022 02.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

3. According to learned counsel for the Petitioner, the grievance of the Petitioner in this case is that the Petitioner has filed a written report on 05.08.2022 under Annexure-2 before the Inspector In-Charge, Jatani Police Station, (opposite party No.3) for registration. As no action has been taken by the said opposite party, the petitioner has filed a grievance petition before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar UPD on 12.08.2022 under Annexure-3. However, the F.I.R. has not been registered. In such background, she prays that necessary direction be given to the opposite party No.3 to take a

// 2 // decision on the above noted written report within a specific time period.

4. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the I.I.C., Jatani Police Station to take a decision on the written report under Annexure-2 in accordance with law, keeping in the mind the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Others1 within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if in the meantime, the same has not been disposed of.

5. Accordingly, this CRLMP is disposed of.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge LB 1 AIR 2014 SC 187