Santosh Kumar Malla v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAPC) No.106 OF 2018 Santosh Kumar Malla .....

Petitioner Mr. D.K. Mohanty, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

09.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.2 & 3 to give him appointment under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme within a stipulated period. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure-12 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection. 5.

As agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure12 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE