Dillip Kumar Biswal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No.2036 of 2018 Manoranjan Mohanty ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opp. Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

21.9.2022 1.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:

"In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstance of the case and considering the grounds and averments made therein, this Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be graciously pleased to direct the appropriate authorities to grant the benefit of MACP to the applicant as per the Orissa Revised Scale of Pay Rules, 2017 as he is entitled to, having already completed more than 10 years of service and further this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the authorities to consider the case of the applicant for sanction and granting the benefit of MACP which he is entitled to as per the Representation submitted under Annexure-3 & 4 in consonance to the notification of the Finance Dept. dtd.20.9.2017 as indicated in the aforesaid representations."

4.

He further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific

// 2 // time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sangita