Santosh Kumar Sahoo v. The District Consumer Protection Officer Cum Adm, Nayagarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.26803 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) Santosh Kumar Sahoo ....

Petitioner Mr. Bijaya Kumar Nayak, Advocate -versusThe District Consumer Protection Officer-cum-Additional District Magistrate, Nayagarh and others ....

Opposite Parties Ms. Suman Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

19.10.2022 1.

1.

Mr. Nayak, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer for direction on payment on certificates, copies of which are annexures 1 to 6, with further interest accrued after 20th December, 2019 have been made by his client. His client made representation dated 11th January, 2021 to opposite party no.1. He prays for direction upon said opposite party to consider the representation.

2.

Ms. Pattanayak, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, opposite party no.1 will, upon direction made, duly consider the representation.

// 2 // 3.

Opposite party no.1 is directed to consider and deal with petitioner's representation dated 11th January, 2021. Within three weeks of communication, result of the consideration is to be made known to petitioner.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks