Raghunath Satapathy v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) (OAPC) No.28 of 2018 Raghunath Satapathy ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

.... Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

07.09.2022

01. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State- Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) Admit the original application.

(ii) Call for the records.

(iii) And after hearing the parties be pleased to quash the rejection list under Annexure-3 so far as the present applicant is concerned and direct the respondents to issue engagement order in favour of the applicant against the post of Contract Teacher TGT (Arts) within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Tribunal and further be pleased to extend all service benefit as is due and admissible to the post of Contract Teacher as has been extended to other candidates who were selected".

5.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before

// 2 // the Opposite Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of one week hence.

6.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to dispose of the representation within a period of one month. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioners within that time. 7.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat