Tapaswini Patel v. Revenue Div. Commissioner, Sundargarh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.27083 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) Tapaswini Patel ....

Petitioner Mr. B.M. Sarangi, Advocate -versusRevenue Divisional Commissioner, Sundargarh and another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Sharma, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

20.10.2022 1.

1.

Mr. Sarangi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had made representation which was received by opposite party no.2 on 10th July, 2022. Claim made in the representation was for rehabilitation benefit. The representation has not been considered. He submits, similarly situated persons have been given the benefit and seeks appropriate direction. 2.

Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, on direction made opposite party no.2 will duly the representation. 3.

Opposite party no.2 is directed to consider and deal with the representation and inform result thereof to petitioner, within three

// 2 // weeks of communication.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks