Surendra Palei v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.27203 of 2022 (Through Hybrid mode) Surendra Palei ....

Petitioner Mr. S. P. Barik, Advocate Mr. Panigrahi, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, AGA Mr. A. K. Parida, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

ORDER

07.12.2022 Order No.

02.

1.

Mr. Panigrahi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is a beneficiary under the housing scheme. Work order was issued and two installments were paid but thereafter, the third and fourth installments were not paid. He submits further, similarly situated persons as petitioner, 35 in number, have received payment but his client, denied. He prays for appropriate direction upon opposite party no.4. 2.

Mr. Parida, learned advocate appears on behalf of opposite party no.4 and submits, there was mistake in including petitioner's

// 2 // name as beneficiary. Mr. Babu, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State. 3.

Petitioner will communicate this order along with his claim to opposite party no.4. Said opposite party will deal with the claim and inform petitioner result thereof. This must be done within three weeks of communication.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant