Prafulla Kumar Majhi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 2856 of 2018 Prafulla Kumar Majhi .....

Petitioner Mr. G. Panda, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

21.09.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the opposite parties by allowing steeping of pay in favour of the petitioner with Opposite Party No.5 by re-fixing his scale of pay in the appropriate slab by sanctioning and disbursing all consequential arrear financial benefits within time stipulated.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time taking into consideration Annexure-5, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing opposite party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4, taking into consideration Annexure-5, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)