Anil Kumar Senapati v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C)(OAC) No.2272 of 2015 Anil Kumar Senapati & Anr.

....

Petitioners -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

29.06.2022

03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- " In view of the facts mentioned in Para-6 above, the applicants pray for the following relief(s):- (i) The Original Application be allowed;

(ii) The Respondents be directed to antidate the regularization of services of applicants as MPHW w.e.f.1.4.2004 with all consequential benefits; (iii) The Respondents be further directed to grant RACP in favour of the Applicants w.e.f. 1.4.2014 with all arrears;

(iv) The Respondents be further directed to allot G.P.F. Number in favour of the Applicants and to enroll them in Pension Scheme, as per Order of regularization under Annexure-6 & 7;

// 2 // (v) Such other order/directions be issued granting complete relief in favour of the Applicants."

4. It is submitted that similar claim has allowed by the learned Tribunal in its order dtd.03.04.2019 in OA No.1106 of 2015 under Annexure-10. It is also submitted that the said order passed by the learned Tribunal was confirmed by this Court in its order dtd.05.07.2021 in W.P.(C) N0.29224 of 2020.

5. In view of the fact that similar claim has been allowed by the learned Tribunal and confirmed by this Court, this Court directs Opp. Party to extend the benefit as prayed for in the writ Petition, if there is no other legal impediment. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three (3) moths from the date of receipt of this Order.

6. The writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha