Pravat Nalini Dash v. Bda, Bbsr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 27447 of 2022 Pravat Nalini Dash .....

Petitioner Mr. G. Mishra, Advocate Vs.

BDA, BBSR and others .....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

28.10.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to demolish the unauthorized construction. 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 and direction be given to the said authority to consider and dispose of the same within a stipulated time. 5.

This being the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)