Nirupama Khamari v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 2223 of 2016 Nirupama Khamari and Ors.

.....

Petitioners Mr. S. Mallik, Adv.

Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

11.08.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to consider their case for promotion to the post of Supervisor in terms of Rule-8 of the pre-amended Rule giving preferential treatment for graduate anganwadi worker. 3.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioners have made representation to the opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-3, and the same may be directed to be disposed of within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection. 4.

As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-3, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE