Sunita Mali v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.C (OA) No.546 of 2015 Sunita Mali ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

12.05.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) Let the O.A. is admitted.

(ii) Notice be issued to the respondents and after hearing to the respondents concerned quash the decision taken by the Selection Board to give promotion to the Respondent No.4 to 6 as Public Health Extension Officer i.e. Annexure-5 and direction be issued to Respondent No.3 to give promotion to the applicant as Public Health Extension Officer forthwith ranking her senior to the Respondent No.4 to 6 in the cadre.

(iii) Let any order / orders / direction / directions be passed as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems think fit and proper And (iv) For this act of kindness the applicant as in duty bound shall ever pray".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

// 2 // 5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to dispose of the representation, taking into account the order passed by the learned Tribunal in O.A. No.403 of 2015 and batch within a period of three months. The decision so taken by Opposite Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner within that time. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat