Krushna Chandra Behera v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) No. 2515 of 2015 Krushna Chandra Behera ....
Petitioner Mr. M.K. Sahoo, Advocate -versusState of Odisha & others ....
Opp. Parties Mr. Biswajit Mohanty, Standing Counsel (School and Mass Education Deptt.)
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No.
ORDER
30.06.2022 01.
RJ 1.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
The writ petition has been registered before this Court on 26th August, 2021, after the original application was transferred from the learned State Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Bhubaneswar upon its abolition.
3.
On perusal of the available order sheets of the learned Tribunal, it is indicated that notices were issued on 05.10.2015 and the matter was never taken up/pursued after 07.02.2018, nor there is any further pleadings on behalf of any of the parties.
4.
The O.A. was filed in the year 2015 by the applicant before the learned Tribunal, while working as Cluster Resource Centre Coordinator of Sana Ramachandrapur PUPS Cluster, At- Sana Ramachandrapur. P.O.-H. Burudi, Dist.-Ganjam, inter alia seeking a direction to allow him to participate in the selection process for the post of CRCC pursuant to the advertisement dated 21.09.2015 of the
// 2 // Opposite Party No.3 under Annexure-6 inviting applications for the post of CRCC occupied by the duly selected and appointed candidates including applicant thereby debarring the present applicant to make application and to be considered for such post on merit (in written test, group discussion, interview).
5.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has no up-to-date instruction to pursue the matter at present on behalf of the petitioner. 6.
Learned Standing Counsel referring to the averments made in the writ petition submits that considering the nature of grievance i.e. challenge to the advertisement of the year 2015, nothing would survive for adjudication at present.
7.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of for lack of up-to-date instruction from the petitioner to pursue the matter at present granting liberty to revive the petition within sixty days for any surviving cause of action.
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge