Pradeep Kumar Naik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C)(OA) No.2706 of 2015 Pradeep Kumar Naik ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

29.06.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- " (a) Necessary order/orders be passed directing the Respondents t grant all service benefits and financial benefits to the applicant as a govt. servant w.e.f.28.02.2004 as attached to the post of Asst. Teacher (TGT Arts) of transferred ULB High School in question, as due and admissible in terms of the Govt. tripartite resolution under Annexure-1, or in alternative at least from the date, the contractual teachers were allowed regular service benefits and financial benefits on completion of 6years of service benefits and financial benefits on completion of 6 years of service following the principles of law laid down by this Hon'ble Tribunal under Annexure-7.

(b) Any other order/orders, direction/directions be issued so as to give all consequential benefits and service benefits to the applicant within a stipulated time, as deemed fit and proper in the given facts and circumstance of the case.

// 2 // And for which act of kindness the applicant shall as in duty bound ever pray."

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting her grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation on 22.02.2015 at Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

4. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law and the order passed under Annexure-7 as well as the facts contained in Para 7 of the resolution under Annexure-1 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

5. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha