Baikuntha Bihari Sahu v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C)(OAC) No.95 of 2016 Baikuntha Bihari Sahu ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

15.07.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the following reliefs:

"This Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to direct the Respondents to allow the Time Bound Advancement scale t the Applicant w.e.f. 27.0-3.2006 and further to consider the case of the Applicant for promotion to the grade of Pump Mechanic through a Review DPC, and to determine and pay all the consequential differential monetary benefits and the consequential retiral benefits to the Applicant within a stipulated time frame, along with interest on such amount which were illegally withheld from being paid to the Applicant."

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant

// 2 // documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha