Chandrakala Sahu v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C)(OAC) No.136 of 2016 Chandrakala Sahu ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

15.07.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the following reliefs:

In view of the facts mentioned in paragraph-6, the applicant prays for the following relief(s):- a) Admit the Original Application.

b) Call for the records.

c) To quash the letter dated -10.12.2015 under Annexure-8 in so far as its applicability to the present applicant or in alternative necessary declaration be made in declaring that the letter dated 10.12.2015 of the Director, Elementary Education, Orissa, has no application to the present applicant.

d) Further direction be issued to include the name of the present applicant in the gradation list and to release all service benefits including revised ACP, promotion etc."

// 2 //

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha