Jayakrushna Mohapatra v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C)(OAC) No. 994 of 2016 Jayakrushna Mohapatra ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

29.07.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "In view of the facts mentioned in para-6 above, the applicant prays for the following relief(s):- i) The Original Application be allowed;

ii) The Respondents be directed to grant G.P. of Rs.4200/- to the applicant as per ORSP Rules, 2008 w.e.f. 1.1.2006.

iii) The Respondents be directed to revise the pension of the applicant after revision of pay and release the arrears arising out such refixation of pension and pensionary benefits; within a date to be fixed by this Hon'ble Tribunal.

// 2 // iv) Pass any other order/orders or direction/directions be issued so as to give complete relief to the applicant."

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha